51% Rule

General Panther Building Discussion
Forum rules
A forum for Panther aircraft builders and Enthusiasts. Two simple rules: Play nice and use a real name
Post Reply
User avatar
Tony Spicer
Posts: 304
Joined: Sun May 05, 2013 7:35 am
First Name: Tony
Last Name: Spicer
State or Province:
Location: Wilmington, NC 7NC1

Re: 51% Rule

Post by Tony Spicer »

Bottom line, build don't worry. There's already one EAB Panther.

Tony

PlaneDan
Posts: 241
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2013 11:52 am
First Name: Daniel
Last Name: Heath
City or Town: Lexington
State or Province: SC USA
Location: Lexington, SC USA
Contact:

Re: 51% Rule

Post by PlaneDan »

So, does anyone have a bottom line on this as it applies to the Panther, without my having to try to decipher a bunch of FAA legalize?
PantherBuilder.org

User avatar
Tony Spicer
Posts: 304
Joined: Sun May 05, 2013 7:35 am
First Name: Tony
Last Name: Spicer
State or Province:
Location: Wilmington, NC 7NC1

Re: 51% Rule

Post by Tony Spicer »

Here's what EAA has to say:

When a kit has not been evaluated by the FAA, the burden to prove the aircraft kit complies with the regulations is solely that of the applicant for the certificate. If the kit was purchased prior to September 30, 2009, and no commercial assistance was used, the aircraft will be certificated under the prior policy. If the kit was purchased after September 30, 2009, or if any commercial assistance was used, the new policy will be used to certificate the aircraft.

More:
http://www.eaa.org/govt/ab_qa.asp
http://www.faa.gov/aircraft/gen_av/ultr ... isting.pdf

Tony

User avatar
mccool
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2014 10:35 am
First Name: James
Last Name: Neely
City or Town: Essex
State or Province: Ontario

Re: 51% Rule

Post by mccool »

Yup I could use Ken MacLeod's email. Thanks Tony. My Sonex flew off to Texas last fall and I'm going through withdrawal.
It certainly has been the frozen north up here lately. We're not used to this kind of weather this far south. We're at the same latitude as northern California for heavens sake!

User avatar
Tony Spicer
Posts: 304
Joined: Sun May 05, 2013 7:35 am
First Name: Tony
Last Name: Spicer
State or Province:
Location: Wilmington, NC 7NC1

Re: 51% Rule

Post by Tony Spicer »

Aha! James Neely, another Sonex builder from the frozen north. Welcome to the world of Panthers. I'm guessing Ken MacLeod, a Sonex builder in Ottawa can answer your question, as he has a Panther tail kit. Holler if you need his email. Be a long time before the Panther makes the list, as it requires a visit from the FAA folks (I think). If an airplane isn't on the list, then it's up to the builder to convince the inspector. Not a problem with the amount of work required to build a Panther.

And I just remembered, to his buds James is Ace McCool.

Tony

User avatar
mccool
Posts: 8
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2014 10:35 am
First Name: James
Last Name: Neely
City or Town: Essex
State or Province: Ontario

Re: 51% Rule

Post by mccool »

The Panther doesn't seem to be on the FAA list yet. How does that work? Could be an issue to build in Canada, since they use that list for approval.

User avatar
Tony Spicer
Posts: 304
Joined: Sun May 05, 2013 7:35 am
First Name: Tony
Last Name: Spicer
State or Province:
Location: Wilmington, NC 7NC1

Re: 51% Rule

Post by Tony Spicer »

Dan,

That certification requires a factory visit by a team from the FAA. Lacking that, it's up to the builder to convince the FAA inspector/DAR. If a quick-build RV-X or Sonex (yes, there's now a QB Sonex) meets the requirement, a Panther sure as heck will.

Tony

PlaneDan
Posts: 241
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2013 11:52 am
First Name: Daniel
Last Name: Heath
City or Town: Lexington
State or Province: SC USA
Location: Lexington, SC USA
Contact:

51% Rule

Post by PlaneDan »

I am sure that the Panther qualifies for the 51% rule. Is that qualification documented anywhere so the builder can feel confident that he or she will not have a problem when going for the pink slip.
PantherBuilder.org

Post Reply